MANKATO — I’m willing to bet that like me, you knew exactly what you were voting for when you cast your ballots in favor of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment back in November, 2008.
To the hunters and fishermen who carried the water for dedicated funding for natural resources over the last decade, the amendment language was crystal clear: Thirty-three percent of the receipts shall be deposited in the outdoor heritage fund and may be spent only to restore, protect, and enhance wetlands, prairies, forests, and the habitats of fish, game and wildlife.
The game and fish portion of the money would be directed to on-the-ground projects that aided the habitat of fish, game and wildlife.
To ensure this, conservation and sports groups insisted that a provision of the amendment be the formation of a panel of citizens and lawmakers that would review funding requests applying sound biology and conservation — not politics — as the measure of worthiness.
In keeping with the spirit and of the amendment language, that panel — the Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council — adopted a narrowly defined interpretation of what “restore, protect and enhance” meant: on-the-ground projects that related directly to fish and wildlife habitat issues.
The Senate has concurred with the LOHC’s definition.
However, some members of the House of Representatives have been playing word games with the amendment and its intent.
In the last days of the 2009 session, the House approved a Legislative Guide for Legacy Funds that broadly re-defined the amendment’s language.
Under their new definition, “prevention” becomes an integral part of “protection,” opening up an avenue for which LOHC funds could/should be spent on education and studies — hardly the kinds of on-the-ground projects originally intended.
The new house guidelines also state that “funding for habitat should include the metropolitan and other urban habitat projects and habitat protection for non-hunting purposes.”
There are other troubling aspects of the House’s guide, as well. The bottom line is that the guide is a blatant attempt to circumvent the amendment’s (and voters’) intent and ultimately, hijack the funds for purposes we as voters never intended.
Some House members have said the guidelines ought to be revisited during the upcoming Legislative session.
Let’s hope so.
In the meantime, our legislators should know that we’ll be watching to see if they’ll cave in to the power brokers within the House and allow this hijacking to go on.
Or if they’ll have the backbone to defend Minnesota voters’ desire to “restore, protect, and enhance” as stated clearly in the amendment.
John Cross is a Free Press staff writer. Contact him at 344-6376 or by e-mail at jcross@mankatofreepress.com.
John Cross
Politics taking away from spirit of wildlife amendment
- John Cross
-
-
Cross: Lawmakers heading in wrong direction with Legacy Fund
Lawmakers have found a way to do what wasn't supposed to happen, substitute fundings for agencies that get Legacy funds rather than supplement the funding of those agencies.
-
Cross: Some traps have no business in nature
When it comes to trapping, there are traps that do the job, and then there is overkill.
-
Cross: Youthful hunters have a thing for rabbits
Once upon a time, rabbits were a popular small-game species.
-
Cross: Legislators need to act on license fee issue
With a poor outlook to its future budget, Minnesota Department of Natural Resource leaders are hoping lawmakers take of the license fee issues during the 2012 session.
-
Cross: For fishing, some ice would be nice
Walt Hohn, owner of Walts Hook, Line and Sinker near St. Peter is anticipating traffic on area lakes and through his doorway will improve dramatically in coming days.
-
Mild winter could be good for ringnecks
For a burdened ringneck population, a mild winter wouldn't be the worst thing.
-
Cross: Mysterious photograph a rare bear? You decide.
A trail camera on farmland northwest of North Mankato snapped a shot of something large and unusual in early December.
-
Cross: Rural Mankato man bags record buck
The next-to-last day of the Minnesota Firearms Deer Season turned out to be a good one for Pat Prose.
-
Gilfillan Lake WMA rehabilitation shows that proof is in the project
A major change is taking place at an area wildlife management area, and the change is for the better.
-
Cross: Open fields make for tough hunting
- More John Cross Headlines
-





