—
It appears that Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty has gone “all in” with the political analysts who’ve concluded that his “Minnesota Nice” approach is getting him nowhere. His pointed attacks against fellow Minnesotan Michele Bachmann have highlighted the stakes in Iowa, where the former governor needs to greatly improve his standing in next month’s straw poll.
We disagree with the proposition that “Minnesota Nice” is a losing strategy for high office. Maintaining a pleasant personality and having a reputation for integrity isn’t a negative with voters, but nastiness is. Last weekend, both Pawlenty and Bachmann succumbed to it, and it should make neither of them more endearing as presidential candidates.
It all seems to have started when Pawlenty, after calling Bachmann’s political record “nonexistent” on Meet the Press, explained himself further on CNN. “My record in Minnesota of cutting taxes, reducing spending, and doing health care reform the right way … stands in contrast to Congresswoman Bachmann — in terms of the sense I actually have results.”
Bachmann may have scored points in this little debate by choosing to be above it all, by saying something like, “Gee, I must be doing something right in this campaign to be attacked so viciously by a fellow Republican.” But Bachmann returned fire with both barrels.
“I have fought against irresponsible spending while Governor Pawlenty was leaving a multi-million dollar budget mess in Minnesota,” she said in a statement.
And so on. Stay tuned for Round Three. It’s obvious now that the two Minnesota Republicans in the 2012 presidential race are hoping to grease their rise, in part, by knocking each other down. It might be small consolation to Bachmann supporters that it was Pawlenty who started this fight, but whether we are Pawlenty or Bachmann supporters or not, whether we are Republicans or Democrats, it should be plain that politicians of the same party, from the same state, both sharing similar political philosophies, do not come out looking good when they go so hard after each other.
It has become commonplace these days to believe that the way to success is not so much by impressing voters with your sterling credentials and leadership qualities, but by bludgeoning your biggest rivals over the head with a sledgehammer.
If that’s the way these two Minnesota candidates think they’re going to prove to voters that they’re ready to lead the country, we can only sigh and say, “Here we go again.”
Editorials
Our View: Pawlenty-Bachmann feud diminishes both
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: State cost estimates need shoring up
New laws are often controversial, and the cost of legislation can be hard to pin down to everyone’s satisfaction — especially when not everyone agrees with the methods used to arrive at the figures.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 22-23, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Study on wages, jobs not worth the time
While we can appreciate the desire to study the differences between public sector and private sectors wages and salaries by House Republican legislative leaders, we can’t help but think this is another study to nowhere.
-
Our View: Highway 14 must be a priority
Why it matters
There is no doubt Highway 14 needs to be rebuilt; the state needs to make it a priority. -
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 20-21, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Making a positive rivalry
Why it matters
Rivalry can be ugly or beneficial; this new tactic to make the most of competition helps a worthy cause. -
Our View: Civic Center deserves state funds
Why it matters
The project is a testament to how partnerships can work and an equity issue for Mankato. -
Our View: Journalist left his mark
-
Our View: Dayton strikes positive tone
Gov. Mark Dayton offered a state of the state message that set a positive tone for the upcoming Legislative session and gave due credit to Republicans and Democrats that have made the state, as Garrison Keillor would say, “above average.”
-
Our View: Obama budget falls short of strategic
The good news of President Obama’s proposed 2013 budget: It increases spending only 0.2 percent. The bad news: There is no reform for long-term fiscal problems like Medicare.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





