—
Lies about the economic stimulus bill of 2009 continue as Mark Twain would say “making their way halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”
A recent report by the Congressional Budget Office is helping the truth put its shoes on.
CBO recently reported that the economic stimulus bill passed in 2009 with bipartisan support created the following economic activity: increased the number of people employed by between 1.2 million and 1.8 million; lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.7 percentage points and 1.5 percentage points and increased the number of full-time jobs by between 1.8 million and 4.1 million.
It also raised the level of Gross Domestic Product by between 1.7 percent and 4.2 percent.
Says CBO director David Elmendorf “The effects of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act on output and employment are expected to increase further during calendar year 2010.” The effects will fade in 2011 and end in 2012, according to Elmendorf.
CBO’s estimates are based on economic modeling and reports of jobs created from required government reports. CBO notes that it did not simply take the numbers from the jobs reports, which it said can understate and overstate jobs created. It did a more thorough analysis of the programs and estimated the stimulus package’s jobs created and their multiplier effects.
It would seem almost academic that one has to doubt how pouring $787 billion into an economy would create jobs. But it’s the creation of confusing information, being repeated and summarized over and over again that has led the American public to the “belief” that “no” jobs were created by economic stimulus.
So how did this lie get half way around the world? It was, at least in part, fueled with a very specific report from the Associated Press that got repeated and summarized inaccurately.
The AP story released in February said specifically that spending on road construction projects alone did not have an affect on “unemployment rates,” and that five economists reviewed their findings to verify their authenticity.
Of course, we don’t doubt this study, but people should remember not having an affect on the “unemployment rate” is not the same thing as not “creating jobs.” Jobs can grow at the same time unemployment rates grow because unemployment rates factor in the growth of the labor force. In other words, if you create 10 percent more jobs, but 11 percent more people enter the workforce, the unemployment rates will go up.
Unfortunately, even usually credible think tanks like the conservative Heritage Foundation put bad headlines on the AP story when they repeated the facts in a commentary piece.
The Heritage Foundation had the headline “$787 billion in stimulus, Zero Jobs, Created or Saved.” The title leads one to believe that of the total $787 billion stimulus, no jobs were created. When in fact, the article contends, though it doesn’t give data to back it up, that it was only $20 billion in road funding that the AP showed didn’t affect the unemployment rate. Even with that, Heritage described the no impact idea on “unemployment” and not the “unemployment rate.” Those are two very different things.
Even the AP story is somewhat misleading in its logic, again, creating an impression no jobs had been created, when in reality, it was the unemployment rate the news service was measuring.
It’s not surprising average folks get confused about this. But news organizations and commentators should be more honest and direct about the real deal.
The stimulus created jobs and growth and helped our economy. Period.
Editorials
Our View: Stimulus did help economy
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: A big hire ahead for North Mankato
North Mankato Mayor Mark Dehen put it well when he described the task before the City Council as it looks to replace longtime City Administrator Wendell Sande.
-
Our View: Today, remember war dead
Why it matters
Seeing the end of war in our sights is the time to remember what has been lost in the journey to get there.
-
Our View: It should be a good, fun summer
Why it matters
There will be a plethora of enjoyable and exciting events in the Mankato area this summer.
-
Thumbs: Redistricting is broken
Thumbs down:
The latest redrawing of Minnesota’s political boundaries came with a hefty legal bill.
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

