—
Freedom of speech in America isn’t really free, a fact becoming increasingly evident whenever a prominent figure makes a remark that offends a significant percentage of the population.
Sanction for unpopular speech isn’t necessarily provided by the government (after all, we still have that pesky First Amendment to deal with), but it emerges through employers and advertisers finely attuned to the outrages of the masses.
The latest high-profile case involves Miami Marlins baseball manager Ozzie Guillen, who unwisely expressed his admiration for Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. This might have been forgiven elsewhere, but this is Miami, where Castro is held in special contempt. Guillen apologized profusely and held onto his job (for now, at least), but his team suspended him for five games just so he got the message.
Which brings us to a fair question: Just where are we headed with public discourse in this country? Has the fear of offending, and the public flogging which so often follows, made the rest of us reluctant to speak our minds? Have we become our own thought police?
There is some cause for concern. Societies that become over-sensitized to unpopular speech run the danger of squelching robust give-and-take, which is what free societies should be about. While it is acceptable to take offense — often necessary — at outrageous commentary, we seem to be growing unsure where the line should be drawn. We clam up, worried that opinions that we think are within the mainstream are no longer tolerated.
Issues regarding free speech are even more confused in some European countries, and in Canada, where political speech itself has resulted in court cases. Granted, other nations are not obligated to see freedom of speech interests as the U.S. does, but we should pay attention nonetheless. We must beware the urge to let our freedoms fray in the effort to ensure that groups will not become aggrieved.
The point is, maybe we should relax a little. Do we really want to live in a country where every disagreeable remark demands some sort of official punishment?
Editorials
Our View: How free is free speech?
- Editorials
-
- Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.
-
Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made
There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.
- Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat
- Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired
-
Shelter for homeless right start
To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest
- Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and
- Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a
- records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th
- Investigate IRS action on groups The revelation that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups has drawn criticism from both parties. But the Wall Street Journal this week revealed that the scrutiny went beyond groups that had "tea party" or "patriot" in their n
- Military needs new approach in assault cases Just when you thought the sexual assault problems in the military couldn't get worse, two events emerged last week to prove you wrong. The chief of the Air Force sexual assault prevention branch was arrested on suspicion of drunkenly groping a woman
- More Editorials Headlines


