The Free Press, Mankato, MN

Editorials

November 17, 2012

Spear column: End-of-life decisions matter beyond the individual

When the Minnesota lieutenant governor’s office called me a few days ago, the topic seemed a bit unusual for a discussion with a public official.

Lt. Gov. Yvonne Prettner Solon wanted to talk about end-of-life decisions and long-term care insurance. The topic has particular relevance for her.

When her husband, former state Sen. Sam Solon, died 11 years ago, the news hit hard, she told me in a phone conversation Wednesday. After his diagnosis, he was given a few months to live.

They had no plans for the end-of-life decisions and it turned into a situation Prettner Solon describes as “very stressful.” An estate sale, probate court, selling the house and moving to an apartment changed her life dramatically and rapidly.

From that experience she promised herself she would not put her children through what she had gone through. She put her affairs in order, set up a will, established a living trust and bought long-term care insurance.

She’s now the main advocate for a state and national program to get people to take these issues seriously. She’s spearheading Minnesota’s Own Your Future campaign.

The effort focuses on three issues: raise awareness among people, especially those 40 to 65, to make some kind of long-term care plan; to work with insurance providers in helping them provide affordable long-term care insurance and other products; and to raise awareness among taxpayers that if we don’t act, we will all pay more.

The reality is hard to refute. For those 65 and older, 70 percent will use some kind of long-term care, Prettner Solon said. And the number of people who are 65 and older will grow by 107 percent between now and 2030. Those who will need to foot at least part of the bill through taxes — those under 65 — will grow by only 6 percent.

This isn’t only an issue of personal finance, it’s an issue of state finance. That’s because state programs such as Medical Assistance and Medicaid will be impacted by the long-term care costs of those qualifying for those programs.

The state’s current expense in long-term care costs comes in around $1 billion. By 2030, the cost could be as high as $5 billion, said Prettner Solon.

“That’s unsustainable. We’ll all end up paying for it.”

The Own Your Future program has a website (mn.gov/ownyourfuture) aimed at raising awareness. They’ve also enlisted some major employer/partners such as Thrivent Financial to take the lead in getting the word out and making their employees aware of the need to plan ahead.

Much needs to be done. A survey by the state showed that one-third of the people had not given the long-term care issue any thought. A good share of the rest thought the government was going to take care of it.

Prettner Solon says people think Medicare will cover long-term care, but in most cases, it does not. It only covers rehab care in a nursing home after a hospital visit of three days.

While the website helps raise awareness, more needs to be done. Gov. Dayton and Prettner Solon sent a letter to all Minnesotans in the 40-65 age group urging them to get prepared and visit the website for information. Prettner Solon said that helped some as the site initially had 40,000 page views, but those people didn’t spend a lot of time on the site. Fewer have come since then and stayed longer.

If you’re concerned about taxes and spending, finding out more about this long-term care issue and making a plan yourself may go a long way to avoiding handing down huge debts to the state’s and country’s next generation.

 

Joe Spear is editor of The Free Press. Contact him at 344-6382 or jspear@mankatofreepress.com

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
  • Safety event helped special kids

    May 25, 2013

  • Our View: Stadium gimmick backfires Officials badly misjudged or misled with electronic pulltab financing.

    May 24, 2013

  • Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.

    May 22, 2013

  • Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made

    There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.

    May 21, 2013

  • Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat

    May 20, 2013

  • Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired

    May 19, 2013

  • mfp thumbgraphic Shelter for homeless right start To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest

    May 18, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and

    May 17, 2013

  • Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a

    May 16, 2013

  • records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th

    May 16, 2013