—
If all our political leaders could be former political leaders, our political culture might not be so cynical and polarized, and some of us may begin truly listening to them.
We probably should be listening to them, and learning from them. Those who’ve led and no longer lead — like former vice president Walter Mondale and former Minnesota governor Arne Carlson — are taking on issues these days freed from their political parties. Though they’ve spent their adult lives on opposite sides of the party divide (Mondale as a Democrat, Carlson as a Republican), they have teamed up for causes they believe in. Chances are they won’t sway a sizable portion of 2012 voters with their opposition to Minnesota’s Voter ID amendment, but at least no one will be able to say they’re enslaved by their political parties.
That’s not an insignificant point these days. At a time when currently serving Democrats and Republicans act like puppets on a string, it’s refreshing to hear from those ex-leaders who are free to state their views on their own terms — and on the issues’ own merits.
Mondale and Carlson are making the rounds these days, saying the amendment is wrong for Minnesota. Predictably, Republicans scoff, especially at the former governor, who they say has abandoned Republican principles long ago.
Fair enough. But no one can say he’s being led by the Republican leadership, for that matter. Nor by any other leadership. As a former governor, Carlson is a free man.
It’s hard to be critical of former politicians speaking out on issues, or living their lives as they see fit past their political primes.
There are many examples of this.
For instance, former presidents can be instructive, and lead the rest of us into periods of thoughtful contemplation. Bill Clinton raised a mini-ruckus recently when he appeared critical of President Obama’s re-election strategies — specifically when he gave faint praise to Obama’s 2012 Republican opponent Mitt Romney and his business acumen at Bain Capital. Democrats didn’t like it. But as a former president, Clinton can say whatever he wants and be listened to.
Freedom can be a balm for other ex-presidents. Jimmy Carter, generally regarded as a poor leader during his 1970s presidency, is admired around the world for his humanitarian causes and for his work in promoting democracy overseas. And last week some of us noticed a photograph of George W. Bush, who quietly toured Africa promoting his institute’s initiative to prevent and treat cervical cancer.
Bush’s trip wasn’t promoted in the press. It was quiet and understated, as the former president has preferred to conduct himself since leaving the White House in 2008.
Bush, regarded by some as a failed president, has already won admiration in some circles for his determination to avoid engaging in political fights post-presidency. He has so-far raised more than $85 million for his cancer cause, and he told a reporter about his African trip: “I hope you don’t see much of it because I don’t want to be in the news. In other words, I believe that quiet service is the best kind of service,” he said.
No doubt, Bush wouldn’t want us to spy a photograph taken of him with an African toddler during his trip. But it should be seen. In the photo, the former president is seen embracing the little boy on his lap, squeezing him lovingly with his right arm while caressing the boy’s head with his left hand — the ex-president, dipping his head slightly to touch the boy’s cheek. It is a touching photograph.
During this election year, as politicians seek the limelight to further their political careers, it’s refreshing to think about our former leaders working either quietly or back in the public picture — not to further themselves, but showing us their humanity and furthering personal causes they don’t have to believe in, but do, anyway.
Editorials
Our View: Free to speak their minds
- Editorials
-
- Safety event helped special kids
- Our View: Stadium gimmick backfires Officials badly misjudged or misled with electronic pulltab financing.
- Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.
-
Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made
There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.
- Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat
- Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired
-
Shelter for homeless right start
To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest
- Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and
- Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a
- records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th
- More Editorials Headlines


