The Free Press, Mankato, MN

Editorials

March 16, 2013

Our View: Dems must negotiate on entitlements

— President Barack Obama paid a visit to his Democratic colleagues in the Senate and the House last week to deliver some realistic advice -- they need to be willing to consider changes to entitlement programs in a deal to reduce the federal deficit.

Many Democrats in the Senate and in the House have been reluctant to consider entitlement reform, some even saying it's off the table. Unfortunately, a federal annual operating deficit in excess of $1 trillion calls for changing the status quo.

Obama has offered up specifics on entitlement reform. He said he is willing to consider adjusting the inflation factor downward for automatic increases in some entitlements like Social Security. Not all Democrats agree with him on this. He has been open to the idea of means-testing Medicare subsidies to recipients.

Obama has told his colleagues in Congress that they need to consider these changes to have any chance of striking a deficit reduction deal with the Republican-controlled House. There also seem to be indications that he will not negotiate on entitlements unless a deficit deal has a balanced approach that includes revenue increases.

That's a reasonable approach Democrats in Congress should be able to accept. Indeed, some, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have endorsed the idea.

Democrats have been successful in the past bringing the fear of entitlement reform to their constituents in a way that throws up a roadblock to deficit reduction. We hope they don't take that approach again. Americans should almost fear constant trillion dollar deficits as much if not more than they should fear some kind of entitlement reform.

In fact, there is some suggestion Americans would be willing to accept some entitlement reform as a means to reduce the deficit. Some 40 percent of those surveyed in December by Pew Research Center said they approved of raising the eligibility age of Medicare to reduce the deficit. In another question, 51 percent approved of reducing Medicare benefits for those with higher incomes in order to reduce the deficit.

Some experts believe Medicare costs can be reduced without cutting benefits. One of the nation's largest private health insurance companies, UnitedHealth, says changing Medicare from a fee-for-service system to one of managed care, coordinated payments and incentives for patients to be healthy and doctors to perform best practices could save $500 billion over 10 years.

Entitlement reform seems more necessary than ever, and now is the time.

 

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
  • Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.

    May 22, 2013

  • Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made

    There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.

    May 21, 2013

  • Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat

    May 20, 2013

  • Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired

    May 19, 2013

  • mfp thumbgraphic Shelter for homeless right start To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest

    May 18, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and

    May 17, 2013

  • Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a

    May 16, 2013

  • records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th

    May 16, 2013

  • Investigate IRS action on groups The revelation that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups has drawn criticism from both parties. But the Wall Street Journal this week revealed that the scrutiny went beyond groups that had "tea party" or "patriot" in their n

    May 15, 2013

  • Military needs new approach in assault cases Just when you thought the sexual assault problems in the military couldn't get worse, two events emerged last week to prove you wrong. The chief of the Air Force sexual assault prevention branch was arrested on suspicion of drunkenly groping a woman

    May 14, 2013