MANKATO —
A plan to curb drunk driving that would lead investigators back to bars has merit if it can be proactive instead of reactive and use carrots instead of sticks.
Bar and restaurant owners know they have a responsibility to cut people off when they’ve had too much to drink, and some say they have no problem with the reach-back enforcement effort. Some, however, worry, they will be unfairly singled out, or will be charged and fined even if they weren’t able to discern the excessive drunk behavior of patrons.
Those are all fair questions. We have to keep in mind the ultimate goal of the new program is to promote public safety and keep everyone aware of when people might be dangerous due to their excessive drinking.
The enforcement program called Retail Alcohol Vendor Enforcement and Education has been operated in Twin Cities suburbs for a couple of years now. There appear to be no major problems with fairness. Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement officers patrol bars to see if people who are obviously intoxicated are being served. If they witness such a case, they immediately speak to the bar owners.
That’s the education piece of the program that is proactive and helpful.
Bars face more severe sanctions including prosecution and fines if law enforcement arrests a drunk driver with blood alcohol content at least twice the legal limit and that person was someone an agent had already noticed as having drank too much during one of their patrols.
To their credit, state and local law enforcement had face-to-face meetings with some dozen of the 60 bar owners in Mankato to explain the program, and provide education packets for others. Education, of course, is key for bartenders and servers and it’s also a proactive, positive way to prevent drunk driving.
We hope the program also raises awareness of bar owners for making sure their staffs know their policies on serving people who appear to have had too much to drink. This kind of enforcement effort is a good reminder that all have responsibility in public safety.
Editorials
Our View: Drinking enforcement must be fair
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Senate should OK line item veto
Why it matters
Another tool to help curb pork barrel politics is a welcome
addition to the kit. -
Our View: Patriot fans behave poorly
Thumbs down: To Pawngo.com and its CEO Todd Hills for his company’s dumping of hundreds of Butterfinger candy bars in Boston’s Copley Square in a jab at New England Patriot receiver Wes Welker for a dropped pass in the Super Bowl.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 10-11, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Legislate voter ID proposal
If 80 percent of Minnesota voters favor requiring a photo ID to vote, we’re wondering why it hasn’t happened at the Legislature.
-
Our View: Santorum shakes up GOP race
Mitt Romney’s message leading up to Tuesday’s nominating contests in Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri was: Vote for me, because I’m inevitable.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





