Let’s face it: The health care reform debate has been as controversial as any legislation in decades. By today, we may know whether the proposal before Congress has passed. But whatever the outcome, this should be only the start of a sustained long-term bipartisan effort to solve a problem that affects the vast majority of Americans, and solve it soon, not 10 years from now.
We shouldn’t even wait until after the election.
That there is some action, and indeed some controversy, is a good sign. That’s often how democracy works. That people, average citizens, are riled up is even better. It’s high time Americans took control or at least heavily influenced their government.
There will be an up or down vote on the current proposal. That’s as it should be. People will know where their representative stands, and they’ll be able to hold them accountable at the ballot box this fall. That many members of Congress are running scared should be seen as a good sign.
Our anger about the process shouldn’t hold us back, however, from becoming informed citizens. There is not much help out there in that respect. Biased news organizations like Fox on the right and CNBC on the left are not helping the American people discern the fact from fiction. More than ever, Americans are on their own, and hopefully not influenced by the pseudo-news that pervades the Internet.
Sources like The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, The New York Times and several solid regional newspapers often provide more in-depth coverage of the issues. Public television does a good job as well. Nonprofits like the Annenberg School of Communication at the University of Pennsylvania with its Factcheck.org also help decipher the lies and half truths elected leaders of both parties seem to have no problem spewing.
Our advice for Americans on this issue: Get as much unbiased information as you can. Read the Congressional Budget Office reports. If you’re watching a news report and it occurs to you the other side is not represented, that probably means that news report is not credible.
Avoid news on the topic where the public’s voices are not allowed to chime in. Last time we checked, Bill O’Reilly (Fox) and Rachel Maddow (CNBC) do not take letters to the editor.
The other advice we have: Listen to your elected leaders. Most have more information than any of us will be able digest in a night. It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t ask tough questions, it means we should respect their position, whatever their political leanings. They are in Washington every day and have access to lots of information and facts. We should remember, however, unless pushed, they will likely give their version of the “facts.”
Finally, we must remember that we are not challenging the system if we don’t have faith in it. Should health care pass, there will be numerous opportunities for us to change it or repeal it or modify it. Whatever the critics say about the reconciliation process or other parliamentary maneuvers, they are still fully legal.
If you want to make a change, get involved, help elect the people you believe will represent you, or help defeat those who don’t. The system has worked for 200-plus years. Now is not the time to be frustrated with defeat. It’s the time to be enthused about the influence everyone can and must have.
Editorials
Our View: Health care debate is not over
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: A big hire ahead for North Mankato
North Mankato Mayor Mark Dehen put it well when he described the task before the City Council as it looks to replace longtime City Administrator Wendell Sande.
-
Our View: Today, remember war dead
Why it matters
Seeing the end of war in our sights is the time to remember what has been lost in the journey to get there.
-
Our View: It should be a good, fun summer
Why it matters
There will be a plethora of enjoyable and exciting events in the Mankato area this summer.
-
Thumbs: Redistricting is broken
Thumbs down:
The latest redrawing of Minnesota’s political boundaries came with a hefty legal bill.
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

