—
When then-presidential candidate Barack Obama ran on a promise to reform the way the federal government works, voters were pleased. It was a promise of a less secretive, more transparent government that we all thought was needed. President Obama's record of compliance, however, has disappointed watchdog groups on both the left and the right.
Opaqueness persists on several fronts. But perhaps most disappointing of all is Obama's failure to shine a brighter light on political donations and to curtail the influence of "big money." Late last month Obama for America was relaunched as Organizing for Action, a tax-exempt organization that is under no obligation to reveal any information about its donors.
Obama has spoken out loudly against secretive Republican special interest groups and he railed against the Citizens United court decision that allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on campaigns. Organizing for Action, however, is modeled along those same lines. Whereas organizers of the nonprofit say they will disclose donor information, they are not obligated to do so.
Organizing for Action will take corporate donations, a reversal from Obama's earlier commitment to limit the influence of special interests. Yet it says it will not take money from lobbyists and other political action committees, prompting Mary Boyle of Common Cause to remark, "It's ironic and puzzling that a grassroots organization with a public interest agenda is going to take unlimited corporate money. It doesn't square."
Conservatives are charging Obama with hypocrisy. Others believe politics has won out over righteousness. "Their practical decision is to pick the money that brings them power over any kind of principled stands," said John Wonderlich, policy director of the nonpartisan transparency group Sunlight Foundation.
But the transparency questions don't stop there. Since Obama issued a memo on his first day in office telling federal agencies that "in the face of doubt, openness prevails" on issues regarding the Freedom of Information Act, several news organizations have reported that most agencies still do not comply, and The White House has largely ignored enforcement.
A government audit in December showed 62 of 99 federal agencies have not updated their FOIA regulations, and 56 agencies haven't updated their regulations since passage of the Open Government Act of 2007. Under Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder's Justice Department has, in fact, provided defense for all agencies withholding information from the American public.
In September, a Bloomberg investigation reported that only eight of 57 agencies complied with documents within the guidelines of the Act. Bloomberg also found there were 720 FOIA-related complaints filed in district courts in the last two years of Obama's first term, a 28 percent rise from the last two years of the Bush administration.
Thus far into the second Obama term, there is little public outrage over this administration's inability to match its lofty transparency rhetoric with results. But we should all feel the disappointment. Obama set himself up to usher in an era of more open government, but he hasn't followed through.
Editorials
Our View: Obama falls short on transparency
- Editorials
-
- Safety event helped special kids
- Our View: Stadium gimmick backfires Officials badly misjudged or misled with electronic pulltab financing.
- Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.
-
Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made
There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.
- Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat
- Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired
-
Shelter for homeless right start
To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest
- Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and
- Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a
- records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th
- More Editorials Headlines


