While some of Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s opponents decried a health care plan unveiled Monday as election year generosity from a governor who has cut plenty of health care, they should welcome the discussion.
Pawlenty flew around the state yesterday, including a stop in Mankato, touting a plan that would introduce quality measures into the health care system and pay bonuses to medical providers who meet the standards.
There would be incentives, for example, to treat diabetic patients so well they would avoid costly amputations. The plan would aim to create incentives for doctors to help diabetics cut blood sugar levels, cholesterol and blood pressure and get them to quit smoking and take an aspirin a day.
Pawlenty estimates the plan might save the state $150 million a year by 2010, and the savings would more than pay for the incentives to doctors.
Pawlenty already has signed an executive order that would cover about a fifth of the state’s population that includes state employees and those on state assisted medical plans.
DFL gubernatorial candidate and Attorney General Mike Hatch said the plan would probably improve patient care, but doubted it would save the state money.
His analysis shouldn’t be taken lightly. As Attorney General, Hatch has become well-versed in Minnesota’s medical systems and their costs, often taking on the big providers and winning settlements.
Other Democrats described Pawlenty’s newfound interest in the health care of Minnesotans as an election year ploy.
Reasonable people could question the governor’s motives, but the governor’s announcement opens the door to doing something, possibly anything, to generate discussion on a serious issue.
There are more Minnesotans without health care than there were four or five years ago. There are certainly likely millions of Minnesotans who are paying much more for health care than they did a few years ago.
Pawlenty, in his defense, has not all of a sudden seen the health care light. While his administration and Republicans did dramatically reduce the rolls of people in Minnesota on subsidized health care and toughened eligibility, the governor also took significant steps to bring about the state purchasing of lower-priced drugs from Canada through the states Rx Connection program.
So the debate should continue beyond the governor’s whistle stops. Health care is too important an issue to leave at the door of political rhetoric.
Editorials
Our View — Health Care key issue in election
- Editorials
-
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 10-11, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Legislate voter ID proposal
If 80 percent of Minnesota voters favor requiring a photo ID to vote, we’re wondering why it hasn’t happened at the Legislature.
-
Our View: Santorum shakes up GOP race
Mitt Romney’s message leading up to Tuesday’s nominating contests in Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri was: Vote for me, because I’m inevitable.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: A new take on mentoring
Why it matters
Success of youth depends on the number of healthy relationships they have during their years of development. -
Spear: Does anchor’s DWI warrant all the coverage?
Covering DWI of a "public figure" leaves room for doubt, debate
- More Editorials Headlines
-





