As soldiers from the Minnesota National Guard finally come home from their near two-year deployment in Iraq, there will be a lot of recognition on just how much they have done for their country. Now it’s time for their country to do something for them.
Congress has been debating extending educational benefits through the GI Bill to members of the Guard and Army Reserve. Many of these “citizen soldiers” do not have the same benefits provided full-time military personnel. That made sense when the role of the Guard and Reserve was mostly restricted to helping with natural disasters and other domestic calamities. Their duties were restricted to several weekends of training and two full weeks a year.
But since 9/11, these citizen soldiers have been on duty much like regular full-time military. They’ve taken on full-time combat roles in overseas locations. Some 600,000 of them have been called to full-time duty since 9/11; 425,000 of them served in Iraq, Afghanistan or other nearby danger zones. Some 133,000 of them have had more than one tour of duty.
But unlike regular full-time military, they lose their eligibility after they discontinue their service. Full-time military personnel get GI benefits for up to 10 years after they leave the service.
The U.S.House of Representatives has passed a bill that would equalize the benefits to some degree. The Senate will be pursuing similar legislation in the next few months.
The Department of Defense opposes expanding benefits, arguing that making Guard and Reserve members eligible only if they stay in the service was the incentive for them to stay in the service. That’s a point well-taken, but it also doesn’t recognize the significant changes to the role of the Guard and Reserve.
U.S. Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., sees the inequity in a personal way. As a Vietnam Vet, he spent 13 months in the full-time military in Vietnam. An aide in his office just got back from a 13-month stint in Iraq, a bullet wound and Purple Heart in tow. The GI Bill paid for the last two years of college for Snyder, and three years of medical school. His aide will get nothing.
Extending GI Bill benefits to Guard and Reserve members will cost $205 million over five years, a price tag that has drawn some resistance in Congress. Yet this investment is well worth the cost.
Many Guard and Reserve members already have skills and the discipline to succeed with higher education and training. Studies show every dollar the government spends on higher education comes back nearly seven times. College graduates tend to earn much more than high school graduates once in the work force.
Extending GI Bill benefits to the Guard and Reserve not only make financial sense, it shows their country is willing to do something for them for the sacrifices made in protecting us.
Editorials
Our View -- Guard, Reserve deserve GI Bill benefits
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Legislate voter ID proposal
If 80 percent of Minnesota voters favor requiring a photo ID to vote, we’re wondering why it hasn’t happened at the Legislature.
-
Our View: Santorum shakes up GOP race
Mitt Romney’s message leading up to Tuesday’s nominating contests in Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri was: Vote for me, because I’m inevitable.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: A new take on mentoring
Why it matters
Success of youth depends on the number of healthy relationships they have during their years of development. -
Spear: Does anchor’s DWI warrant all the coverage?
Covering DWI of a "public figure" leaves room for doubt, debate
-
Our View: Amend politics, not the Constitution
Why it matters
Many constitutional amendments are pseudo “people power” that weaken real democracy. -
Our View: Acrimony fractures bipartisan spirit
Thumbs down: To state leaders … again.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





