Everyone, it seems, wants a local water park.
Mankato officials have long had it on their wish list. North Mankato planners, too, are envisioning a water park in their future.
The plans are fueled by public demand. And for good reason: Water parks are fun and a positive way for kids and families to spend time together.
Water parks, once built, are always a hit. Waseca’s new outdoor water park has had higher use than expected. The same has been true of most parks opened in any city.
They are also expensive. The private sector can, in some cases, justify building a water park — particularly as part of a hotel project. But there are few cases where a large publicly available water park can be built and operated as a profitable private venture.
Like parks, civic centers and libraries, water parks are justifiably viewed as a legitimate public investment for the entertainment and betterment of a community.
That doesn’t make it any easier to find ways to pay for them.
With both the Katos wishing for a water park it would seem the perfect opportunity for the communities to throw their, uh, rubber duckies in the same tub.
Everyone talks about how the cities should cooperate more to gain efficiencies in government spending. In their defense, the communities’ governments do cooperate on many things. And there are things that each city does separately that makes sense to keep separate.
But we hope leaders from both cities would seriously look at joint construction of a water park.
The benefits would be obvious — the park could be bigger and better (perhaps an indoor/outdoor park?), costs could be shared by taxpayers of both cities and residents from both communities would benefit from using it.
It doesn’t matter which city gets the building, but ideally it would be located at a point providing the closest access to the most residents in both communities.
There’s no reason it can’t work, if leaders in both cities want it to. We hope elected officials and staff will try.
Editorials
Our View — Collaborate on a water park
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
-
Our View: Senjem is positioning
Thumbs down: To Senate Majority Leader Dave Senjem’s posturing on civic center funding.
-
Our View: When will this partisan war end?
Earlier this year in his State of the State address, Gov. Mark Dayton said “If we cooperate, if we share our best ideas, if we exchange our rigid ideologies for our shared ideals, we will revitalize our state.”
-
Our View: War on terror isn't over
Weary of a war on terror that has gone on for years, we would like to declare victory and return to normalcy. But the terror war goes on.
-
Our View: River issues need to be addressed
People living in the Minnesota River basin, particularly those in the region around Mankato, may not be aware they are increasingly under scrutiny and facing criticism.
-
Our View: A chance to step up against bullying
The visit by an anti-bullying task force gives this community an opportunity to brainstorm how to stop bullying.
-
Our View: Stadium deal works for Vikings, fans
The biggest win for Minnesota in the Vikings stadium deal is that it finally got done.
Minnesota will have a professional football team for the next 30 years playing in a first-class stadium. -
Our View: Bonding bill was important
-
Our View: Blame Lugar's loss on arrogance
Richard Lugar’s loss in the Indiana Republican primary this week came as a bit of a shock to party stalwarts since his opponent, state Treasurer Richard Mourdock, is a Tea Party candidate who received support from Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

