Everyone, it seems, wants a local water park.
Mankato officials have long had it on their wish list. North Mankato planners, too, are envisioning a water park in their future.
The plans are fueled by public demand. And for good reason: Water parks are fun and a positive way for kids and families to spend time together.
Water parks, once built, are always a hit. Waseca’s new outdoor water park has had higher use than expected. The same has been true of most parks opened in any city.
They are also expensive. The private sector can, in some cases, justify building a water park — particularly as part of a hotel project. But there are few cases where a large publicly available water park can be built and operated as a profitable private venture.
Like parks, civic centers and libraries, water parks are justifiably viewed as a legitimate public investment for the entertainment and betterment of a community.
That doesn’t make it any easier to find ways to pay for them.
With both the Katos wishing for a water park it would seem the perfect opportunity for the communities to throw their, uh, rubber duckies in the same tub.
Everyone talks about how the cities should cooperate more to gain efficiencies in government spending. In their defense, the communities’ governments do cooperate on many things. And there are things that each city does separately that makes sense to keep separate.
But we hope leaders from both cities would seriously look at joint construction of a water park.
The benefits would be obvious — the park could be bigger and better (perhaps an indoor/outdoor park?), costs could be shared by taxpayers of both cities and residents from both communities would benefit from using it.
It doesn’t matter which city gets the building, but ideally it would be located at a point providing the closest access to the most residents in both communities.
There’s no reason it can’t work, if leaders in both cities want it to. We hope elected officials and staff will try.
Editorials
Our View — Collaborate on a water park
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: A big hire ahead for North Mankato
North Mankato Mayor Mark Dehen put it well when he described the task before the City Council as it looks to replace longtime City Administrator Wendell Sande.
-
Our View: Today, remember war dead
Why it matters
Seeing the end of war in our sights is the time to remember what has been lost in the journey to get there.
-
Our View: It should be a good, fun summer
Why it matters
There will be a plethora of enjoyable and exciting events in the Mankato area this summer.
-
Thumbs: Redistricting is broken
Thumbs down:
The latest redrawing of Minnesota’s political boundaries came with a hefty legal bill.
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

