It’s impossible to recognize all the worthy causes marked by a national day, week or month designation. But there is one that we, as defenders of free speech, can’t let slip by without mentioning. Banned Book Week wedges itself into the shrunken, skeptical hearts of journalists.
If you take a look at the list of most challenged books compiled by the American Library Association, you’d understand why it’s so important to stand up for the right to read what we choose.
The “Harry Potter” series by J.K. Rowling is not only on the list but is the most challenged book series so far in the 21st century, according to the ALA. These are the books that succeeded in getting 9-year-olds to turn off the TV for days at a time. Maybe there was an outcry from chiropractors afraid that children lugging around 500-page tomes would do permanent damage to their little spines. Librarians were thrilled that a new batch of enthusiastic readers was born.
The number of classics that have made the list is eye-popping: “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck, “The Catcher in the Rye” by J.D. Salinger and “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain are in good company along with multiple other must-reads.
Today’s readers might assume times have changed and that society today is so much more open to new ideas and stories. But the ALA says U.S. schools and libraries received written complaints requesting removal of 546 books in 2006, more than 30 percent higher than the previous year’s total of 405.
Instead of wringing their hands and worrying about the trend, librarians across the country have drawn attention this week to banned books by putting up special displays, distributing lists of challenged books and spreading awareness about the fact libraries are places to expand minds. In North Mankato, some of the books that have made the challenged list are wrapped with yellow “CAUTION” tape and put on display.
Now that’s a sure way to get curious readers’ attention. And that’s what Banned Book Week should be all about.
Editorials
Our View — Take a peek behind the caution tape
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Legislate voter ID proposal
If 80 percent of Minnesota voters favor requiring a photo ID to vote, we’re wondering why it hasn’t happened at the Legislature.
-
Our View: Santorum shakes up GOP race
Mitt Romney’s message leading up to Tuesday’s nominating contests in Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri was: Vote for me, because I’m inevitable.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: A new take on mentoring
Why it matters
Success of youth depends on the number of healthy relationships they have during their years of development. -
Spear: Does anchor’s DWI warrant all the coverage?
Covering DWI of a "public figure" leaves room for doubt, debate
-
Our View: Amend politics, not the Constitution
Why it matters
Many constitutional amendments are pseudo “people power” that weaken real democracy. -
Our View: Acrimony fractures bipartisan spirit
Thumbs down: To state leaders … again.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





