When a student at Minnesota State University is caught drinking underage in a dorm, or cited for other alcohol or drug violations, the university can’t contact the parents unless the students had earlier signed a release form allowing it.
That issue is coming under scrutiny by the Minnesota State Colleges and University system and the Legislature.
In light of drinking-related deaths in Mankato and at campuses around the state, it is an issue that deserves a full airing.
Currently, the state Data Practices Act considers “educational data” to be private if the student is at least 18 years old.
Allowing state universities to contact parents about students’ violations provides one more tool to deal with the problem of hard drinking by some students. Parents can be a powerful influence in helping students who are dealing with problems — if they know about it.
The argument against allowing the release of such information to parents is compelling: College students are adults.
But society has long agreed that adults of different ages are treated differently. That’s why the legal drinking age is 21, not 18.
It is not a stretch for the Legislature to give parents of young adults — going to taxpayer-supported institutions — the right to receive notification of legal problems and potential dangers their kids are facing while off at school.
And, parents who are providing some type of monetary support for their kid’s college have a right to be notified that their “investment” may be at risk by dangerous behavior by their son or daughter.
The relationship between universities and students could also be viewed more as a contract. A university will promise to fulfill its obligations to educate and help students and the students will fulfill their obligations and follow basic rules, and agree that their parents may be notified by the school if needed.
The issue of parental notification is different than another issue being debated in Mankato and at other state university towns — whether students should be dealt with by the university when they commit a crime off campus. Universities are already allowed to hand out academic sanctions or other measures against students who run into legal problems off campus. MSU doesn’t currently level consequences for off-campus behavior but is considering it.
A bill to allow universities to contact parents about offenses committed by students has been introduced in the Legislature the past two sessions but hasn’t been passed. With recent publicity over student deaths, the bill will get more attention in the upcoming session.
It’s an issue with strong arguments on both sides. But with the real problem of increasingly heavy drinking, the scale tilts toward allowing universities to make parents a bigger part of their students’ lives.
Editorials
Our View — Parents have right to know
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Legislate voter ID proposal
If 80 percent of Minnesota voters favor requiring a photo ID to vote, we’re wondering why it hasn’t happened at the Legislature.
-
Our View: Santorum shakes up GOP race
Mitt Romney’s message leading up to Tuesday’s nominating contests in Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri was: Vote for me, because I’m inevitable.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 8-9, 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: A new take on mentoring
Why it matters
Success of youth depends on the number of healthy relationships they have during their years of development. -
Spear: Does anchor’s DWI warrant all the coverage?
Covering DWI of a "public figure" leaves room for doubt, debate
-
Our View: Amend politics, not the Constitution
Why it matters
Many constitutional amendments are pseudo “people power” that weaken real democracy. -
Our View: Acrimony fractures bipartisan spirit
Thumbs down: To state leaders … again.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





