The Free Press, Mankato, MN

Editorials

April 22, 2008

Our View — Smoking shack idea should be burned

Those who opposed a statewide smoking ban can’t seem to take no for an answer when it comes to weakening the ban.

This year, they’re trying again. They want to allow bar owners to build so-called “smoke shacks” outside of bars and restaurants that would allow smokers to presumably stay warm while they light up. Several Democrats and Republicans, including Rep. Bob Gunther, R-Fairmont, presented the smoking shack amendment for amending onto a budget balancing bill shortly before midnight on April 3.

There didn’t appear to be a lot of debate and the amendment passed the House 73-59. All Republicans representing the Mankato region and St. Peter Democrat Terry Morrow voted in favor of the “smoke shack” provision. They were joined by a number of Iron Range Democrats who have long argued the smoking ban hurts the business, though certainly not the health, of small resort owners in northern Minnesota. Rep. Kathy Brynaert, D-Mankato, was the only Mankato area legislator who voted against the amendment.

That this amendment was adopted without proper debate reeks of subterfuge. Beyond that, it’s just bad health-care policy and bad fiscal policy. The health-care costs saved by the statewide smoking ban already are apparent. Thousands of smokers have signed up for quit smoking plans, saving the state millions in health-care costs. A recent University of Minnesota study showed cancer risks for bar employees has dropped since the smoking ban took effect.

Sen. Kathy Sheran, D-Mankato, the freshmen legislator who ushered the controversial ban through the Legislature last year, says the vague amendment creates a “huge loophole” in the state’s smoking ban. Bars could build “smoke shacks” as big as they wanted, connecting them to a small room as the main bar. The amendment states that bar employees could not serve people in the smoke shack but leaves open the possibility the smokers could take food and drink with them to the smoking shack.

At the very least, this bill should be given a full debate and pulled from the budget balancing bill to which it is attached.

Proponents of the amendment say they want to provide relief to bar owners who’ve been hurt by the smoking ban. But many of those owners already have created patios and other smoking-permitted places for their businesses. Those proponents also should consider the fiscal implications of this exception to the smoking ban. Do the profits of some bar owners outweigh the savings in smoking-related health-care costs to taxpayers?

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorials
  • Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.

    May 22, 2013

  • Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made

    There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.

    May 21, 2013

  • Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat

    May 20, 2013

  • Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired

    May 19, 2013

  • mfp thumbgraphic Shelter for homeless right start To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest

    May 18, 2013 1 Photo

  • Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and

    May 17, 2013

  • Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a

    May 16, 2013

  • records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th

    May 16, 2013

  • Investigate IRS action on groups The revelation that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups has drawn criticism from both parties. But the Wall Street Journal this week revealed that the scrutiny went beyond groups that had "tea party" or "patriot" in their n

    May 15, 2013

  • Military needs new approach in assault cases Just when you thought the sexual assault problems in the military couldn't get worse, two events emerged last week to prove you wrong. The chief of the Air Force sexual assault prevention branch was arrested on suspicion of drunkenly groping a woman

    May 14, 2013