Congress seems to have fallen off the wagon again by adding $1 billion in spending for energy incentives to a bill to fund wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Members of both parties approved the $106 billion in spending to fund wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through Sept. 30 in votes last week. The bill contained $80 billion for combat operations, and $26 billion for non-military aid to countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan. It also contained $7 billion to fight flu pandemics and money for replacing military equipment.
But it also contained $1 billion for a new spending program that provides $4,500 vouchers for people buying or leasing new cars that are more fuel efficient.
Of course, fuel efficiency is a worthy goal, but with the country running on a record deficit of $1.8 trillion, we should not be throwing around even a billion dollars so lightly. Congress has approved plenty of incentives for fuel efficiency in energy bills it has passed, and the president himself can adjust the mileage standards on vehicles manufactured in the U.S.
Five Republicans voted in favor of the bill along with 221 Democrats, according to Thomas voting reports. Some 32 Democrats and 170 Republicans opposed the bill. U.S. Rep. Tim Walz, D-Mankato, voted in favor, while Rep. John Kline, a Republican representing Le Sueur County, voted against. Democrat Collin Peterson, whose district includes Sibley County, also voted in favor. Minnesota’s only senator, Democrat Amy Klobuchar, also voted in favor.
The vast majority of the spending the bill went for its intended purpose — war spending. Many of those who voted in favor probably did not like the extra $1 billion on non-war related spending, but voted in favor because they favored most of the bill. That is often the defense one hears from members of Congress. They held their nose but voted in favor for the overall good the bill does.
That’s laudable. But at some point, someone in Congress has to make a point of order to curtail some of these frivolous add-ons that not only anger the public, but cause them to lose faith in the government.
Editorials
Our View — War funding bill had unnecessary spending
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
-
Our View: Senjem is positioning
Thumbs down: To Senate Majority Leader Dave Senjem’s posturing on civic center funding.
-
Our View: When will this partisan war end?
Earlier this year in his State of the State address, Gov. Mark Dayton said “If we cooperate, if we share our best ideas, if we exchange our rigid ideologies for our shared ideals, we will revitalize our state.”
-
Our View: War on terror isn't over
Weary of a war on terror that has gone on for years, we would like to declare victory and return to normalcy. But the terror war goes on.
-
Our View: River issues need to be addressed
People living in the Minnesota River basin, particularly those in the region around Mankato, may not be aware they are increasingly under scrutiny and facing criticism.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

