An Obama administration plan to bolster lending and access to capital for small banks and small business seems overdue given the billions shelled out last year to banks and businesses deemed “too big to fail.”
The initiatives would increase the limits on the size of loans from the Small Business Administration from $2 million to up to $5.5 million, depending on the program. Micro loan limits would be expanded from $35,000 to $50,000. Most SBA loans contain some kind of government guarantee to private lenders, but also require securing of assets as well.
The plan also aims to provide low interest capital to banks with assets of less than $1 billion, which would cover many community banks. The government through the Federal Reserve would provide capital to such banks at a rate of 3 percent, instead of the current 5 percent. Rates would increase to 9 percent after 5 years to encourage timely payback.
Some banks in underserved rural areas could get capital for as little as a 2 percent rate.
Obama told the Wall Street Journal that the big banks were not as much in need of Trouble Asset Relief Program funds, but noted the small banks and small businesses still have not gotten access to capital as a result of the program that mostly served mega banks.
The small business loans and small bank capital would be funded with existing TARP money and would not be dependent on paybacks from big bank TARP recipients.
While free market purists may see this expansion of a loan program something that leads down the same path as bailing out the big banks, we should remember that money will be mostly issued through programs already in place. The SBA has a history of operating in a straightforward fashion.
It’s important to make sure small businesses have access to capital in ways that allow them to compete with their big business competitors that received injections of federal money last fall.
Editorials
Our View: Small business plan seems equitable
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
-
Our View: Senjem is positioning
Thumbs down: To Senate Majority Leader Dave Senjem’s posturing on civic center funding.
-
Our View: When will this partisan war end?
Earlier this year in his State of the State address, Gov. Mark Dayton said “If we cooperate, if we share our best ideas, if we exchange our rigid ideologies for our shared ideals, we will revitalize our state.”
-
Our View: War on terror isn't over
Weary of a war on terror that has gone on for years, we would like to declare victory and return to normalcy. But the terror war goes on.
-
Our View: River issues need to be addressed
People living in the Minnesota River basin, particularly those in the region around Mankato, may not be aware they are increasingly under scrutiny and facing criticism.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

