When the discussion of federal spending involves billions of dollars, it’s never “a little too little, a little too late.”
Feeling pressure from the American public on the size of the U.S. deficit and runaway spending, the Obama administration has begun to formulate a deficit reduction plan. Officials are seriously considering using at least part of a $210 billion surplus in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) fund to lower what is projected to be a $1.3 trillion annual deficit.
The Office of Management and Budget also under the administration’s direction has asked all departments except defense and veterans affairs to plan two budgets for the fiscal year starting next October: one that has flat spending and one that envisions a 5 percent reduction in spending.
Of course, federal spending is complex, and there are plenty of opportunities for Congress and the administration to break their own rules. The proposed flat and reduced spending in all likelihood does not include entitlement spending, such as Social Security, that has automatic increases built into law.
Still, the effort to propose some kind of spending restraint, some kind of fiscal responsibility at a minimum puts the Obama administration on record. If the administration fails, and capitulates to a Congress that seems more and more pre-occupied with other things, it will have to face the music of not only Tea Party protesters but other citizens as well.
Obama’s OMB is also looking at “simplifying the tax code” and “revamping the corporate tax code,” but, according to The Wall Street Journal, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is pushing for significant spending cuts to go with any planned tax increases.
Some members of Congress appear ready to get serious about deficit reduction as well. Sen. Kent Conrad, D.- N.D., who chairs the Senate Budget Committee, has said he won’t vote for raising the Treasury’s borrowing limit unless the administration gets serious about deficit reduction.
Some Obama administration officials remain wary that reducing the deficit by cutting spending could choke off economic growth and any recovery. But carrying a deficit nearly three times what it was just a couple of years ago will also be bad for the economy — if not now, then in the long run.
Editorials
Our View: Deficit gets needed attention
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: A big hire ahead for North Mankato
North Mankato Mayor Mark Dehen put it well when he described the task before the City Council as it looks to replace longtime City Administrator Wendell Sande.
-
Our View: Today, remember war dead
Why it matters
Seeing the end of war in our sights is the time to remember what has been lost in the journey to get there.
-
Our View: It should be a good, fun summer
Why it matters
There will be a plethora of enjoyable and exciting events in the Mankato area this summer.
-
Thumbs: Redistricting is broken
Thumbs down:
The latest redrawing of Minnesota’s political boundaries came with a hefty legal bill.
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

