If there’s one thing Americans should agree on regarding the immigration problem in this country, it’s that the system of detention is inadequate.
What to do with borders, what to do with illegal aliens already here — those remain issues that severely divide well-meaning people. But meanwhile, large numbers of the undocumented among us who are detained are being held in places not meant for them, struggling with a system that confuses nearly everyone. Comprehensive changes to existing immigration policies will be tedious, but we can start by addressing the incarceration issues.
In Minnesota, 8,000 people are involved in deportation proceedings, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Between 200 and 300 are currently in custody, detained in county jails. The majority of those who are deported have no criminal record, but they can spend months in these jails because they’re considered a flight risk.
The issue here is not whether these individuals should be detained and deported; the issue is whether county jails provide the proper environment. Detainees are not the typical jail population. There are more women among immigrant detainees and a more diverse representation of nationalities is represented, complicated by language barriers. Mental health and medical issues are unique to the detainees, and though medical standards have been spelled out, they are not legally binding.
The Obama administration agrees the situation is not a good one, but for the moment there is no other alternative. ICE pays the counties to house the detainees. In this economy, the counties are happy to fill up their jails and get the cash.
In October, the federal government announced the intention of developing a new plan, using risk assessment strategies to better determine appropriate facilities for detainees. The plan is to explore the use of converted hotels, nursing homes and other residential facilities for non-criminal detainees.
This new directive, which will take years to implement, carries with it its own issues. One is whether enough suitable facilities can be built or converted. Another is the sensibilities of local populations. A third is when, or whether, the government will be able to follow through on its declared intentions.
In the meantime, thousands of people in Minnesota, and many more across the country, continue to be housed in facilities not designed for them.
Editorials
Our View: Immigrant detention is broken
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: Interlock system for DWI works
It’s no stretch of the imagination to argue a new law governing drunk driving in Minnesota is likely having a significant impact on public safety.
-
Editorial: Teachers: experience is not everything (Poll)
Why it matters: Teacher seniority protection not the best way to ensure the most qualified teachers are in the classroom.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: A new take on mentoring
Why it matters
Success of youth depends on the number of healthy relationships they have during their years of development. -
Spear: Does anchor’s DWI warrant all the coverage?
Covering DWI of a "public figure" leaves room for doubt, debate
-
Our View: Amend politics, not the Constitution
Why it matters
Many constitutional amendments are pseudo “people power” that weaken real democracy. -
Our View: Acrimony fractures bipartisan spirit
Thumbs down: To state leaders … again.
-
Latest editorial cartoons Jan-Feb. 2012
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
-
Our View: Health cost a bigger issue than charity care
The cost of “uncompensated care” provided by Minnesota hospitals rose 27 percent in 2010, according to the Minnesota Hospital Association, with not-for-profit hospitals providing $226 million in charity care and $498 million in costs not covered by Medicaid reimbursements.
-
Latest editorial cartoons
A sampling of editorial cartoons from around the U.S.A.
- More Editorials Headlines
-





