MANKATO —
It’s campaign season and there are a few givens: some candidates will try to win voters with platitudes and avoid talking of solutions to our fiscal problems that unfortunately are very complex and not amenable to sound bites.
Will tax cuts to business or upper income people stimulate the economy? Will extending unemployment benefits help the economy? Can we sustain the current level of entitlement programs for the elderly like Social Security and Medicare? How much can we deficit spend and add to our debt before our international lenders start demanding higher interest rates?
The nonpartisan Concord Coalition offers several sobering thoughts and a needed reality check for candidates in its latest Washington Budget report.
The group says the latest long-term budget outlook from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has “thrown sand into the political gears of both parties as they develop their fiscal policy arguments for voters.”
Among the campaign statements Concord says the CBO report debunks: that tax cuts for anyone have no long-term harm to the fiscal situation, that health care reform this year “saved” Medicare or that Social Security payments will not continue to be a problem for the long-term budget picture.
The automatic spending increases in Social Security and Medicare will grow faster than the money coming in to pay for them, and will, if benefits are kept even at the current level, require borrowing, according to CBO.
Those stark realities do not come forward on the campaign trail by either party because they’re bad news for voters. Pick a demographic, and one can find something that must be cut in order to keep the budget in balance and stem the tide of red ink. All voters will have to swallow hard choices and honest candidates will tell them so.
CBO notes economic growth alone will not solve the long-term budget problem that puts all of the economy at risk. Some balance of tax increases and spending cuts will be needed. That’s the reality. Any politician who says differently is either ignoring the facts or intentionally deceiving, or in a fantasy land.
Says Concord: “CBO’s August Update confirms that all policy options — spending cuts and tax increases — should remain on the table in discussing potential solutions to our nation’s structural deficit. Economic growth alone will not be enough to achieve a sustainable fiscal policy, nor will trimming everyone’s favorite target — waste, fraud and abuse. Campaign rhetoric that suggests otherwise is not supported by the facts.”
This statement comes from an organization whose co-chairmen are former Sen. Warren Rudman, a Republican, and former Sen. Bob Kerrey, a Democrat.
Fortunately, there is a group of former private sector and public sectors experts trying to shed light on the problem and offer reasonable solutions. Voters would be well advised to listen to what they have to say.
The Concord Coalition and the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s upcoming “Fiscal Solutions Tour” will not suggest specific political solutions, but will offer its audience a number of options that need to be considered.
Voters would benefit from investing time in this effort to understand the problems before they spend time listening to another stump speech by candidates rife with platitudes but deferring the realities.
Unfortunately, as the Democrats chide Republicans for ideas of trimming Social Security and Republicans chide Democrats for proposing tax increases, both are leaving themselves little room to compromise once they must solve the real problem.
For more information on the current federal budget problem and the fiscal solutions tour, go to www.concordcoalition.org
Editorials
Our View: Solutions, not platitudes
- Editorials
-
- Our View: Stadium gimmick backfires Officials badly misjudged or misled with electronic pulltab financing.
- Timing still legislative problem One can appreciate the deliberative, legislative process in Minnesota. We can respect the hours and hours of time legislators put in debating important issues. But time management seems to be an issue whatever party reins. This year is no different.
-
Legislature: Vows kept, mistakes made
There will be plenty for Gov. Mark Dayton and the DFL legislative majority to crow about this week after the conclusion of the session Monday night.
- Our View: Lakes reveal chemical abundance Even if your mother may not have had scientific data at her fingertips, she obviously knew what she was talking about when she said don't drink lake water. A new study makes that advice more important than ever and raises concerns about how we treat
- Press 'shield law' is a bad idea Press 'shield law' is a bad idea The Obama administration announced last week that it is throwing its support behind the press shield law that has been stalled in Congress since time immemorial. Critics insist that the administration, suddenly mired
-
Shelter for homeless right start
To Mankato civic leaders for, once again, stepping up to address a growing demand for shelter by homeless women. The needs appears to be dramatic and continuing even though the Theresa House, Welcome Inn shelters and the CADA House program for domest
- Our View: SEC should act on ratings conflicts Money talks. In the continuing dispute over the all-too-cozy relationship between the people who create and sell financial products and the people who rate their risk, the money says: Shut up and let us do what we want. Minnesota Sen. Al Franken and
- Time runs short for Legislature Focus, Minnesota legislators, as you have many details left So much for the theory that one party controlling Minnesota's House, Senate and governor's chair would mean fast work in St. Paul. Exactly one week from the end of the 2013 regular session a
- records' seizure harms free press This has not been a good week for President Obama. First it was learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative organizations with special scrutiny, the practice of which the White House said it was unaware. Then news surfaced th
- Investigate IRS action on groups The revelation that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups has drawn criticism from both parties. But the Wall Street Journal this week revealed that the scrutiny went beyond groups that had "tea party" or "patriot" in their n
- More Editorials Headlines


