MANKATO —
Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s refusal to allow the state to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in federal health care funding will provide an ignominious legacy for the governor.
It’s also a devastating blow to Minnesotans seeking access to health insurance, to the poor and to the health care industry, which is so vital to the economy of the Mankato region and the state.
The Republican governor, citing his distaste for federal health care reform, had refused to accept funds that would allow early enrollment of the state’s poorest into the Medicaid program. He’s turned down more money that would go to everything from creating a federal high-risk insurance pool in Minnesota to funds for sex education in schools.
This week, the governor used an executive order — a tool he’s wielded often to circumvent the legislative process — to formally forbid any state agency from accepting any of the federal health-related funds, unless specifically required by state law.
There are plenty of people who dispute the wisdom of federal health care reform, but even ardent detractors know it’s foolish not to accept federal funds — including those paid by Minnesotans — because of policy disagreements. In fact, other Republican governors — even those suing the feds to stop health care reform — have ensured their citizens get their fair share of funding.
This week the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce — a Republican-friendly group — urged Pawlenty to seek the discretionary federal dollars.
The potential loss of funds is significant. Some estimate the state could lose $1.4 billion in state health care funding in the next few years, including money that could fund some 20,000 jobs.
It’s impossible to believe Pawlenty’s actions are not tied to his aspirations as a presidential candidate. But his moves are doing him no good with voters — at least here in his home state. A new survey shows even his Republican base is fleeing from him because of his failure to take care of state residents as he travels the country to early presidential primary states.
The only positive thing is that the state’s next governor will have time — a very short time — to undo some of the damage by accepting funds after they take office.
Voters should quiz the candidates on exactly what they would do in regard to federal healthcare funds if elected.
Editorials
Our View: Pawlenty does state a disservice
- Editorials
-
-
Our View: A big hire ahead for North Mankato
North Mankato Mayor Mark Dehen put it well when he described the task before the City Council as it looks to replace longtime City Administrator Wendell Sande.
-
Our View: Today, remember war dead
Why it matters
Seeing the end of war in our sights is the time to remember what has been lost in the journey to get there.
-
Our View: It should be a good, fun summer
Why it matters
There will be a plethora of enjoyable and exciting events in the Mankato area this summer.
-
Thumbs: Redistricting is broken
Thumbs down:
The latest redrawing of Minnesota’s political boundaries came with a hefty legal bill.
-
Our View: Voter ID not as simple as it seems
Why it matters
Constitutional amendment means it is set in stone; we need more details.
-
Our View: A healthy approach to learning gaps
As Minnesota schools leave behind No Child Left Behind, a new accountability system shows a promising and realistic approach to closing the achievement gaps in schools.
-
Our View: NFL critics mobilize, but Vikings here to stay
Excitement was in plain sight earlier this month when the final touches were put on plans to build a $975 million stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, ensuring that the state and the team will be linked together for at least the next 30 years.
-
Our View: Winona State's gain is MSU's loss
Why it matters
Scott Olson brought much to Minnesota State University and to the community; his leadership will be sorely missed.
-
Our View: Good turnout at anti-bully session
Community involvement in solving the bullying problem is identified as important. Mankato had a strong showing at a recent meeting on the subject.
-
Our View: Automatic cuts will test Congress
It appears the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that Congress passed last year are working as designed, or maybe not.
- More Editorials Headlines
-

