Why has the government for thousands of years concerned itself with the licensing of marriage?
Social studies confirm that a mother and a father is what is best for children, and what is best for the children is also what is best for future societies. Marriage legally ties the man and the women and asks them to be responsible for the education and care of the children born of that marriage. Because of the ability for one man and one woman to create children, marriage is unique and should be defined as such.
The government is not in the business of licensing relationships or love. The government does not license friendships, engagements or co-habitation. Marriage is not about what adults want or desire, marriage is about what is best for the children and the future of society.
I will vote “yes” on the marriage protection amendment in November to protect marriage as between one man and one woman and for the future of families and society.
I would also remind voters who may choose not to vote on this issue that their ballot will be counted as a “no” vote — a non vote is a “no” vote.
Your View
October 4, 2012
Your View: We license marriage because of children
- Your View
-
-
Democrats used bait and switch on business
My View: DFL policies hurt small businesses and favored big ones
- Public servants have become taskmasters
- Legislative dealing trips trust
- DFL achieved much good at Legislature
- Pay schools back first, then maybe roads
- Congress failing on Social Security promise
- Religious arguments fall short on gay marriage
-
War on terror was Trojan horse
Neocons had multi-war plan; Obama brings sanity to policy
- Sports coverage focused on negatives
- Challenge fossil fuel industries
- More Your View Headlines
-


