Maybe I’m just slow, but most of the time I have no idea what the editorial cartoons in The Free Press are all about.
A few days ago, there was something about a kid snorting cocaine off a sidewalk. It was supposed to mean there was a problem with kids and pretty heavy drugs, which makes sense, except I had never heard of the problem before. The rest of the paper had nothing else on the story and even when I later searched the Internet I found nothing to indicate that it is really a current event. So basically, there was no context. It’s really quite offensive.
The rest of the editorials are a collection of Star Trek images, Americans being fat and lazy, something about global warming and George Bush.
I know The Free Press doesn’t draw the cartoons but maybe they could exercise a bit more discretion in what they choose to run.
Tom Q. Johnson
Mankato
Your View
Your View — Newspaper’s choice of cartoons offensive
- Your View
-
- Your View: Voting ‘no’ on amendment the Minnesota thing to do
- Your View: Pitts column would not be missed by many
-
My View: Global warming issue still unsettled
- In Response: Better information, better choices
- Your View: Catholic leadership blurs church and state lines
- Your View: More sex offenders equals more threats
-
Your View: Communities should get on the buckthorn removal bandwagon
I would like to see an article on the eradication of buckthorn, which was placed on the noxious plant list back in the 1980s.
- Your View: Republican obstructionism will backfire
-
My View: Men must be part of solution to problem of violence
-
In Response - Don’t blame Legislature for property taxes
Rep. Tony Cornish
R- Good Thunder
- More Your View Headlines





